Repository | Journal | Volume | Articles
(2000) Synthese 122 (3).
I. A. Kieseppä's criticism of the methodological use of the theory of verisimilitude, and D. B. Resnik's arguments against the explanation of scientific method by appeal to scientific aims are critically considered. Since the notion of verisimilitude was introduced as an attempt to show that science can be seen as a rational enterprise in the pursuit of truth, defenders of the verisimilitude programme need to show that scientific norms can be interpreted (at least in principle) as rules that try to increase the degree of truthlikeness of scientific theories. This possibility is explored for several approaches to the problem of verisimilitude.
Publication details
Full citation:
Zamora Bonilla, J. P. (2000). Truthlikeness, rationality and scientific method. Synthese 122 (3), pp. 321-335.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.