Repository | Book | Chapter
![210079](https://sdvigpress.org/images/publi/_default.jpg)
(1997) Commonality and particularity in ethics, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
Trust does not fall neatly into the traditional categories of the philosophy of mind. Perhaps this is why it has not been a favourite topic of professional philosophers. Of course, this could as well be a reason why one should be interested. Admittedly, the times are changing;1 but there still seems to be a lot of confusion about how to fit trust into a more general account of human action.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-25602-0_5
Full citation:
Lagerspetz, O. (1997)., The notion of trust in philosophical psychology, in L. Alanen, S. Heinämaa & T. Wallgren (eds.), Commonality and particularity in ethics, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 95-117.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.